Project files
A new project directory is empty. Everything that is true for every task has to come from somewhere: the stack, the conventions, the names, the way the work runs. Without one place for it, every story repeats it, or somebody guesses it. This skill writes that place.
Skill name: handoff-project-files-atlassian. It reads all of the discovery,
including the backlog.
How to start it
Section titled “How to start it”From the workbench, in the directory the project lives in:
Let's write the project files for this project.In a new session, name the skill and say where the discovery is:
/handoff-project-files-atlassian The discovery is at <Confluence URL>.Write the project files into this directory.What it asks first
Section titled “What it asks first”One question, and the skill never assumes the answer: who may see what. Is the code public? Is the discovery public? Is the tracker public? Those three answers decide what may go into a file you commit and what has to stay in a private file. They are the difference between a useful handover and a leak.
Then it proposes a development flow instead of assuming one, and it shows you both files before it writes anything.
What goes into the README
Section titled “What goes into the README”Short, and only from the discovery pages. A README for a new project gains nothing from being long.
| Part | What goes in it |
|---|---|
| Name and one sentence | From the one-line pitch in the brief. |
| The problem and who has it | Two or three sentences from the brief. A stranger reads this part, and no generator can invent it. |
| Status | Honest: early, and what does not exist yet. |
| Getting it running | What you need and which commands to run, from the technical frame. Plain steps if the project is not a workbench. |
| Configuration | The environment variables the technical frame names. The names, never the values, and never a default that would work in production. |
| License | Only if you decided on one. If you did not, the README says that it is missing. The skill does not pick one for you. |
The README is the most public file in the repository, so the rule about internal pages is strictest here. No link into Confluence, no issue key, no customer name, not even under “see also”.
What goes into the agent instructions
Section titled “What goes into the agent instructions”Only what is true for every task, and only what is in the discovery pages.
| Part | What goes in it |
|---|---|
| What the product is | Two sentences from the brief. An agent that knows the purpose makes better small decisions. |
| The stack | From the technical frame: the languages, the services, and what the app brings as its own dependency. |
| Cross-cutting conventions | Word for word from the technical frame: authentication, validation, the shape of an error, how identifiers are built, migrations instead of an init script. |
| Domain vocabulary | The entity names, one line each, and the language you chose for names in the domain model. This is what keeps every story from inventing its own words. |
| Structure | Only with more than one subject area: one module per area, the entities it owns, and the direction between them. The agent reads this file while it builds, so this is how the areas get into the code. |
| Where decisions go | docs/adr/, numbered, plus the rule that nobody reopens a decision that is written down. |
| How the work is run | Servers through monoceros-ctl and .monoceros/launch.json, not by starting them in a shell. Plus what an acceptance command looks like, including the check that keeps the areas apart. |
| The development flow | Only if the tracker is public. If it is not, the whole flow goes into the private file. |
The file is CLAUDE.md for Claude Code and AGENTS.md for OpenCode. Both are
English unless you ask for something else, even when the discovery pages are in
your language. They sit next to the code, the ADRs and the commit messages.
The project has what it needs, and the build starts. In the workbench the Claude Code roles pick up a story: one writes the plan, one implements it, one reviews the result against the plan.